Affichage des articles dont le libellé est samsung. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est samsung. Afficher tous les articles

dimanche 22 mai 2016

Samsung Galaxy Note 5 review ,Software, S Pen and Performance CAMERA Battery Life, Call Quality, Speaker Quality and Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Note 5 review

PROS

  • Sleek, glass design
  • Speedy overall performance
  • Great camera
  • Slimmer design makes it easier to hold in one hand

CONS

  • S Pen experience not radically improved
  • Smaller battery
  • No micro SD card support or removable battery

KEY FEATURES

  • 5.7-inch 1440x2560 QHD screen
  • 16-megapixel main camera
  • 4GB RAM
  • Exynos 7420 octa-core processor
  • 3,000mAh battery
  • Fingerprint sensor
  • Android 5.1.1 Lollipop
  • 5-megapixel front-facing camera
  • 4K video recording at 30fps
  • Wireless charging
  • Manufacturer: Samsung
Even though the Galaxy Note 5 has been on shevles for over 6-months now, us UK dwellers have still yet to see an official release. We'd say the time has been and gone for the Sammy's latest 5.7-inch device ever hitting these shores, but fear not. We're already starting to hear rumours about the upcoming Note 6 and it sounds rather special. Early internet talk speaks of a 4K display, 6GB RAM and 256GB storage, with a release day of 'mid-May'.
If you can't wait that long, you're not out of luck. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge boasts a 5.5-inch quad-HD display, though it feels much smaller, and packs a nicer overall build than the Note 5. You don't get the S-Pen, though.

WHAT IS THE SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 5?

The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is the 5.7-inch smartphone successor to the Note 4, arguably one of the standout phones of 2014. So it’s somewhat surprising that Samsung has taken the decision not to bring its new phablet to the UK.
Instead, it’s hoping the S6 Edge Plus, along with the S6 and S6 Edge will fly the flag and battle against the iPhone 6S and 6S Plus. But it still seems like a strange decision considering how well received last year’s Note was.
Was it the wrong decision? I’m not so sure. Having lived with the new Note and the Note 4 before it, I can see why Samsung may have decided to leave its latest phablet on the sidelines in the UK, as there are a few design changes that may alienate diehard fans of the series. But, even with these issues the Note 5 remains one of the best phablets on the market.

SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 5 – DESIGN

I didn't think there was a great deal wrong with the Note 4's look, but as is custom with Samsung, it does like to make some improvements where it can. In the case of the Note 5, it's quite a dramatic design overhaul. It's basically a Samsung Galaxy S6 blown up. There's glass on the front and back, the cool silver anodised aluminium metal trim and a rear camera sensor that protrudes even more than it does on the Note 4. It also takes the curved edges on the S6 Edge and Edge Plus and puts them on the back. In my opinion, it makes more sense ergonomically than having them up front and as a result makes it a much more comfortable to hold.
The most noticeable difference when you get it in your hand is that it's not as wide as last year's phone. Samsung were more successful than most at making its big phone easier to use in one hand, and it's more of the same with the Note 5. In fact it's better. The screen bezel has been reduced significantly down the sides of the 5.7-inch screen and it's better-looking phone as a result.
Samsung has waved goodbye to the textured plastic back and replaced it with a glass panel, similar to that seen on the Galaxy S6. The bad news is the back is no longer removable. That means no micro SD card support or removable battery. Personally, I'm not disheartened by the fact Samsung has taken this option to follow Apple's approach, but I can see why micro SD card support would be beneficial to loyal Note users who don't want to rely on cloud services.
Note 4 next to the Note 5
The headphone jack has moved to the bottom of the phone alongside the micro USB charging port and single speaker. In its place is the Nano-SIM card slot, which will mean a change for Note 4 users. There's now even more sensors above the screen and both multitasking and back buttons are more prominent alongside a smaller home button with the improved built-in fingerprint sensor. It’s the same one as the S6, so you can tap instead of swipe to unlock your phone. It’ll also support Samsung Pay when it launches outside of the US. IR blaster fans will be disappointed to find out that this is missing in action, so you’lll have to look elsewhere for a backup remote control.
The standby buttons and volume rocker are in an identical place and I've not forgotten about the S Pen. It's still tucked away at the bottom of the phone but you no longer have to dig your finger into the gap behind it to remove it. Now you simply press the top of the stylus in and it'll pop out thanks to the spring loaded mechanism. Apart from a change in colour and finish, it's not a dramatically new experience holding it. It does now have a ball point-style button up top that doesn't have any function apart from making it feel more like a pen. The grippy texture on the Note 4's one is now replaced with a flat light grey surface and there’s just a single button on the side. Samsung still packs a set of additional nibs in the box along with a tool to easily remove them. The nibs let you choose between two pressure sensitivities.
Using it day to day, the Note 5 manages to retain that great big screen in a smaller body that's easier to stretch your fingers across. It's noticeably heavier than the S6 Edge Plus, but less so than the Note 4 (there's a 6g difference). Having a big glass back worries me especially having dropped the S6 and seen the back crack. But I can't question that the Note 5 looks the part and the changes on the whole are welcome ones.
Note 5 review 41

SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 5 – SCREEN

The Note 5 has the same 5.7-inch screen with Gorilla Glass 4 as its predecessor, which means you get all the benefits of the 1440x2560 QHD resolution display. It also has the same Wacom digitized layer to help sense the pressure when you pop out the S Pen from its little compartment.
The display has the same punchy colours and exceptional black levels as the Note 4's. Get up close though and the slight increase in PPI pixel density pays off. It looks sharper and you can notice it especially on the home screen where app icons look cleaner and clearer.
The Note's Super AMOLED screen is built for watching videos and that's inevitably where the Note 5 excels. You still get those deep blacks and the bump in PPI and brightness helps things feel all that more vivid. Brightness has been cranked up notch, not that things were dull on the Note 4, but it’s a notable improvement.
If there’s one criticism it’s that out of the box screen colours look a little oversaturated. Samsung does still offer screen mode options to turn things down a notch. Opt for the basic mode and it doesn't feel as bad. But I'm nitpicking here.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 - Software, 
S Pen and Performance


SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 5 – SOFTWARE

Samsung's approach to Android has never been universally loved. But it feels like it's finally taking a step in the right direction and has started cutting the amount of bloatware it loads onto smartphones.
With the Note 5, you’re getting Android 5.1.1 Lollipop with Samsung’s TouchWiz UI overlaid on top. With Samsung’s track record of getting new Android updates rolled out, I wouldn’t hold my breath that Android Marshmallow will arrive on the Note 5 before the end of 2015.
As it stands though, the Note 5 follows in the footsteps of Samsung’s other flagships. Take that bloatware situation for instance. Aside from the generally very polished native apps Galaxy Life (Think Xperia Lounge on Sony phones) and the Galaxy App store are the only Samsung apps that make their way onto the Note 5. Generally, the Note 5 does a good job of packing things in folders like tools and Google apps. Microsoft's suite apps including Word, OneDrive and Skype are also organised keeping the app drawer clutter-free.
Outside of the app drawer, you do still have the Flipboard support by swiping all the way right. Samsung clearly can't resist at least having on home screen widget in the attempt to lure you into the Galaxy realms, but it's a bin dumping away. Aside from that, there's the shortcuts to the core S Pen features as well. Again, you can dump that as well. Aside from that, there's not really much new. The app icons have a curvier look and all the same settings and options are largely in tow.
Aside from that, there’s nothing really out of the ordinary. Google Now is still activated from the home button and the notification tray combines the best elements of Samsung’s own TouchWiz UI and Android Lollipop. You still get the multitasking feature that was present on the Note 4 and there’s some modes that simplify the UI. I have to confess I am a big fan of the new background themes as well, especially the Space one. But that’s not a feature that’s unique to the Note 5.
Note 5 review 11

SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 5 – S PEN SOFTWARE AND APPS

As for the S Pen, it doesn’t feel like a radically different writing experience than it was on the Note 4. Samsung claims the Wacom-powered S Pen is more accurate and offers improved response but that’s not something I noticed. It’s still built for small note-taking and making annotations, not writing full blown articles or diary entries – largely because there’s not enough room to make that comfortable to do.
There’s some changes in the UI and the features department though that should come as welcome additions for S Pen users. When you pop the S Pen out of its compartment and press down on the S Pen’s solitary button just above the screen, you’ll activate the new Air Command. This is a redesigned menu system, that groups together optimized Note features. These include Action memo, Smart select, Screen write and a slightly redesigned S Note. There’s also a few settings tucked away in the bottom corner that let you add a floating icon that sits permanently on the screen, but I found it a nuisance more than anything.
Note 5 review 39

Another new feature is the ability to take notes on the screen when it’s turned off. Unfortunately, I didn’t have any luck getting it to work. It has to be activated in the S Pen section in the main phone settings, but despite numerous attempts, it just didn’t happen.
Other useful additions include the ability to write, edit and annotate PDF files. Taking screenshots has improved as well letting you capture the entire page of an email instead of the section currently in view.
While changes are not wholesale, I’m sure S Pen fans will appreciate the changes and the Note 5 remains the phone to use if you want to break away from typing with your fingers.

Note 5 review 43

NOTE 5 – PERFORMANCE

If there’s one thing you don’t need to worry about it’s the Note 5’s overall performance. Samsung employs the same custom-built Exynos 7420 octa-core processor with the new 14nm manufacturing process to improve efficiency. There’s also a 4GB RAM, which is 1GB more than the S6 and the S6 Edge is packing. Bottom line, the Note runs slick, speedy and I didn’t encounter any issues using it.
From swiping through homescreens, launching apps and more intensive tasks like gaming, it’s up there with the best. That extra 1GB of RAM also helps on the multitasking front.
On the graphics front, the Note 5 packs a Mali-T760 MP8 GPU. Running our go-to game Real Racing 3, it handles the graphically demanding title with ease. There’s no lag or framerate issues, just like the rest of the Samsung flagship family.
The benchmark scores back up the impressive performance putting it on par with the S6, S6 Edge and Edge Plus, which you can see below. In the Geekbench 3 multi-core score it's on parity with the S6 Edge Plus (5,014). It also scores an impressive 6,3485 in AnTuTu's Benchmark v5.7.1 test.

SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 5 – CAMERA

The Note 4 had a great camera and it’s more of the same with the Note 5. Again, it’s modelled on the setup used on the Galaxy S6, S6 Edge and S6 Edge Plus with key features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) and the ability to capture RAW images included. The latter means you can now have more control with editing images without sacrificing detail. There’s an improved 16-megapixel main camera on the back with a new wider f1.9 aperture lens that should in improve low-light shooting and generally capture brighter images. If you want to know how it fares against its predecessor, you can check out our Note 5 vs Note 4 in-depth comparison.
Up front is a 5-megapixel camera sensor with a wide angle selfie option to help you badly mimic that famous Oscar selfie. On the video front, there’s still 4K video restricted to five minutes of recording but you do still of course have the ability to shoot more without restrictions at Full HD 1080p video at 60fps. The on board optical image stabilization will also help reduce the blur and keep things steady.
It remains one of the best smartphone cameras for overall image quality and ease of use. Though be warned, low-light photography is still by no means perfect.
Note 5 review 35

The camera app is a familiar place and puts a big emphasis on shooting in Auto mode. Though there’s a pretty comprehensive Pro mode, which offers a raft of manual features like white balance, ISO sensitivity and exposure if you really want to tinker around with the settings. It wouldn’t be a Samsung phone if it didn’t come packed with camera modes as well. There’s a Selective Focus, Panorama, Slow Motion, Fast Motion, Virtual Shot and a Video collage mode. So there’s plenty here if you want to be more playful with your images and video.
One of the notable new modes is Live Broadcast to YouTube. Think Periscope but with the ability to shoot in higher resolution and in both landscape and portrait orientation. Yes, this one is for the Vloggers. It works with both front and rear-facing cameras and is very easy to setup, although there’s a little delay initially when the broadcast is being set up.
Overall image quality is solid across the board. In bright, natural light, the Note 5 produces the most rewarding results for both landscape and macro-style images. There’s plenty of colour and vibrancy but at times Samsung can overdo it with the saturation. Samsung’s HDR mode is a saviour in many situations but it can have a tendency to add more sharpening than you need. This can adversally affect the natural feel of images.
Note 5 samples 13

Up close, the Note 5 does a great job of capturing great levels of detail
Note 5 samples 11

It's a similar story from afar where colours are punchy and vibrant but can at times look a little oversaturated
Note 5 samples 7

Indoors with good light, it manages to capture a good blend of natural tones and rich colours
So what about when it gets dark? Image noise doesn’t disappear altogether and you have the same 16-megapixel sensor to play with as the Note 4. The wider aperture does help brighten up images, particularly outdoors with a some light source.

   Note 5 samples 15

Under artificial lighting, the Note 5's optical image stabilization comes in handy
Note 5 samples 9

There's still some image noise present, but this image taken at around 10pm does still offer some decent detail
Note 5 samples 17

Again, even with some lighting, you can capture some really great images in low light
For shooting video, the Note 5 is a solid performer as well. Footage is vibrant and colourful with good audio capture. 4K video inevitably requires a 4K monitor or TV to take real advantage of the higher resolution video quality.

Battery Life, Call Quality, Speaker Quality and Verdict

SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 5 – BATTERY LIFE

The Note 5 has a smaller battery than the Note 4. Now there’s a 3,000mAh battery down from the 3,200mAh on in the Note 4. It’s also enclosed in that glass back giving loyal Note users another reason to shake their collective fists at the Korean company for dropping one of the Note’s key features. Samsung's worked to make up for this via wireless charging and improved turbo charging.
I found the Note 5’s battery performance is very similar to the S6's. It will get you a day and a half on average with general use, which is about the same as the Note 4 and about the same as the iPhone 6S Plus. That’s without tapping into one of the two power saving modes now available on the Note 5. The Ultra Power Saving mode has been moved to the Battery section in the settings menu. A new Power Saving mode takes its place in the Toolbar in the notification tray. It doesn’t offer the same greyscale mode, instead focusing on elements like limiting maximum CPU performance, reducing screen brightness and disabling Vibration feedback.
Note 5 review 9
There’s more though. An abnormal battery usage feature detects apps that are using an unusual amount of power when the phone is turned off. In my case it was Runkeeper. The gave me a percentage how much battery the battery was consuming and the option to force stop the application.
When you’re watching video, the battery drop-off is not as severe as you’d imagine it would be. I streamed an episode of House of Cards on Netflix with the battery at 100% and the screen brightness at about 75% of the maximum setting. That’s what I consider an acceptable viewing brightness on the Note 5. By the time the episode finished, the battery reading was 90%, which is impressive when you consider there’s a hulking power-sapping QHD screen involved here.
It was a similar story when I took it out running making use of the GPS. As the screenshot from the Battery HD illustrates, I went out running for a couple of hours using the Runkeeper app and Spotify playing music in offline mode and the battery drop off wasn’t severe as I anticipated.
Note 5 samples 5
Battery HD screenshot shows the impact of using GPS for a couple of hours running
It’s a slightly different story for more routine tasks like simply checking in on Twitter or browsing where the drop-off appears more apparent. So what’s the explanation for such an impressive battery performance even with the drop in capacity? I can only think that it has something to do with Samsung’s own custom-built processor. The Korean company now uses a 14nm Exynos processor, down from the 20nm in last year’s models. The changes in design aim to create a more power efficient performance and it clearly helps with more intensive tasks.
When you do run out battery life, you do have a pretty impressive turbo charging mode. This only works with the charger Samsung supplies in the box and will power your phone up noticeably quicker than it does from a standard micro USB charger or wireless charging. When my Note 5 died, after 10 minutes of charge it was back up to 20%. After 25 minutes, it was just below 50%. After just over an hour it was back to 100%. It’s clear the initial stage of the charge is much quicker than the end part. That means it’s the ideal solution when you need a quick charge in the morning.

SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 5 – CALL QUALITY AND SPEAKERS

Don’t expect marvels from call quality on the Note 5. Having lived with a Note 4 for a while now, there’s not a massive upsurge in overall performance. It’s loud, clarity is strong but not best in class. I’d still say that Sony and HTC’s flagships continue to shine in this department. I didn’t experience any drop outs during conversations and the other person on the line didn’t have any issues hearing my side of the conversation.
It employs the same secondary microphone setup as its predecessor to help noise cancelling in loud environments and it works as advertised. There’s also an additional volume mode if calls are sounding a little on the quiet side. But that does mean you sacrifice some of the finesse and the detail in the calls.
Unfortunately, it’s a similar story with the speaker. The solitary speaker has moved from the back of the phone to the bottom edge next to the micro USB charging port just as it is on the Galaxy S6. It’s not the worst offender when you’re listening out loud, but it could be so much better. It’s offers about the same volume as the Note 4, but has a similar sound profile. There’s just enough warmth breaking out with enough detail and finesse to sit through a YouTube video or two. If you’re watching a film though, I’d suggest plugging in a pair of headphones.
Note 5 review 21
On the subject of headphones, Samsung includes a pair of its clearly Apple-inspired in-ears. They have the same white hue but do include two pairs of silicone rubber ear cushions for a comfortable fit. You won’t want to go running with them but they’re not a terrible sounding pair of in-ears. You don’t get exceptional levels of detail and bass response is adequate. But they’re not so muddy sounding that you wouldn’t want to wear them.
Samsung includes a handful of modes to improve sound quality and give you more control of how video and music sounds like through a pair of headphones. The Adapt Sound let’s you create a sound profile that’s better suited to your ears. It uses a series of beeping tests where you need to confirm whether you can hear them or not. This then creates a sound profile. In my case my left ear was apparently used more frequently. I can’t say I really noticed a major difference.
It was a similar story with the UHQ Upscaler mode, which apparently enhances the sound resolution increasing the clarity and detail through wired and wireless Bluetooth headphone listening. I didn't notice a discernible upsurge in sound quality. I did however have more luck with the SoundAlive+ and Tube Amp Pro features that do add a nice touch of warmth and widen the soundstage a little to offer a richer experience. It certainly works better with more expensive headphones than the ones slung into the box with the Note 5.

SHOULD I BUY THE NOTE 5?

This is a difficult one. If you live in the UK, then you’re not going to go into a shop and pick one up because Samsung is pushing the Galaxy S6 Edge Plus as the bigger alternative to the S6 and the S6 Edge. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t other means to get hold of one.
If you’re a loyal Note fan and already own the Note 4, then I would personally wait until the next instalment unless you really like the look of the sleeker, S6-inspired design. You will have to live without the microSD card slot and non-removable battery – two key features that made the Note series so desirable. Along with the S Pen of course.
Note 3 users might find more reason to upgrade, particularly in the screen, camera and performance department. The battery performance is vastly improved in comparison to the older Note as well. But again, it really depends on how much you value those core Note features Samsung has decided to ditch.

Note 5 review 47

So how does it compare in price with Samsung’s other flagships? Well, it’s not as expensive as the Note 4 at launch, which cost £619 SIM-free. A 32GB Note 5 can be picked up online for around £450. To put that into perspective, the Galaxy S6 (32GB) is currently available SIM-free at Carphone Warehouse for £450. The Note 5 is basically a bigger S6 with a larger battery, more RAM and the S Pen. A 32GB Galaxy S6 Edge will cost you £529 SIM-free and the S6 Edge Plus (32GB) is a massive £600.
Its nearest non-Samsung competitors are the LG G4, Sony Xperia Z5 Premium and the iPhone 6S Plus. The two Android phablets are more competitively priced with the Note 5 while the 6S Plus starts at £619 for the 16GB model. While I can’t comment on the Z5 Premium as I’ve had no time to use it, I have lived with the G4 and the 6S Plus, and the Note 5 is definitely an equal if not better big phone.

VERDICT

The Note 5 is one of the best phablets on the market, but it’s lost of some its uniqueness.
                                                                                                          Abdellahg SLAOUI

samsung-galaxy-s7-VS-iphone-6s

Samsung Galaxy S7 vs iPhone 6S: 

Is there a new flagship king?

iPhone 6S vs Galaxy S7: Apple vs Samsung battle it out for mobile domination


The Samsung Galaxy S7 is now on the market, heralding the next round in the ongoing Samsung vs Apple smartphone grudge match.
Now that our review is in, we can confirm that the Galaxy S7 is a serious contender for the top smartphone crown. It might pack a familiar design, but a faster CPU, improved battery, and a stunning-looking camera could well be giving Apple more cold sweats than the FBI.
Of course, it wasn't too long ago that Apple released its iPhone 6S flagship. Many saw that phone as one of Apple's best ever 'S' devices, so it's not like Samsung has the market all sown up right up until the launch of the iPhone 7.
Here's a step-by-step breakdown of Samsung's new handset and how it stacks up against Apple's current iPhone.

SAMSUNG GALAXY S7 VS IPHONE 6S: DESIGN

Samsung Galaxy S7: 7.9mm thick, 152g, metal alloy, glass front and back, IP68 certified, Black/Gold
iPhone 6S: 7.1mm thick, 143g, Series 7000 anodised aluminium back, Space Gray/Silver/Gold/Rose Gold
The Galaxy S6 was the prettiest phone Samsung's ever made by quite some margin. It ditched the horrid plastic backs seen on past Galaxy phones, replacing them with a wonderfully luxurious mix of glass and metal. The design made the Galaxy S6 look and feel premium.
However, its design still didn't completely beat Apple's. While the iPhone 6S's design doesn't radically differ from its predecessor, the iPhone 6, it remains one of, if not the best put together phones on the market. true, it may not be as iconic as the iPhone 4 or iPhone 5, but it's a much more pleasant phone to use day-to-day.
It's curvier and somehow warmer than previous iPhones. What's more, with Apple's use of Series 7000 aluminium, it's also tougher than before.

However, picking between it and the Galaxy S7 is tricky, as Samsung's made a number of small but important design changes to its latest flagship. The camera sensor bump is gone and Samsung's added a few millimetres to the thickness by adding a slight curvature to the back, reminiscent of the Galaxy Note 5.
This thickening is actually a considerable improvement, making it much more comfortable to hold and less prone to slipping out of your hand. It also means that the Galaxy S7 is a lot easier to pick up from a flat surface, which is an important attribute.
What's more, Samsung somehow managed to make the gorgeous looking Galaxy S7 IP68 certified. This means that, unlike the iPhone 6S, the Galaxy S7 can survive an accidental aquatic encounter unscathed. That this has been achieved with no external signs of 'ruggedisation' - flaps, a thicker display etc. - is impressive.
Samsung's design hasn't really gotten any prettier this year, then, but it has become a lot more practically sound. That's just as important as aesthetic considerations, if not more so, and it's enough to give the Galaxy S7 a win over the iPhone 6S in this area.

GALAXY S7 VS IPHONE 6S: DISPLAY

Samsung Galaxy S7: 5.1-inch Super AMOLED, 2,560 x 1,440, 577ppi
iPhone 6S: 4.7-inch IPS LCD, 1334 x 750, 326ppi, 3D Touch
The Samsung Galaxy S7's display is very similar indeed to the S6's. This means that once again it is radically sharper than the iPhone 6S's screen, and once again displays deeper blacks thanks to its Super AMOLED tech.
For those that don't know, AMOLED screens display deeper and richer blacks by electrically charging each individual pixel when generating colours, letting them create blacks simply by turning off the relevant pixels. LCD technology lights up all pixels, even when they're displaying black, making for a slightly washed out grey look. This means that the Galaxy S7, like the S6, has a more vibrant and sharp display than the iPhone 6S.
Of course, some will argue that AMOLED screens tend to be oversaturated, making films and pictures look false and other worldly. But Samsung, as always, offers a number of screen tone options so that you can attain a more naturalistic picture if you so wish.

That Galaxy S7 screen also has a cool new always-on feature. The feature is a low power screen mode that activates when the phone is put to sleep. It offers peek views of incoming notifications and alerts from certain services, meaning you can check who's messaged you without having to fully power up the display.
However, we felt that this always-on feature was a little half-baked, with limited functionality and poor app support. It's a nice idea, but it isn't truly useful yet.
The Galaxy S7's screen also doesn't feature a competitor to Apple’s 3D Touch tech. 3D Touch is a nifty feature that lets the iPhone's screen detect varying amounts of pressure. It can be used to enact a variety of tasks, like previewing emails and websites. For iPhone 6S owners familiar with 3D Touch, the lack of an equivalent feature on the Galaxy S7 could be a sticking point.

GALAXY S7 VS IPHONE 6S: PERFORMANCE

Samsung Galaxy S7: Exynos 8890 octa-core/Snapdragon 820 quad-core CPU, Adreno 530/Mali-T880 MP12 GPU, 4GB RAM
iPhone 6S: Apple A9 64-bit dual-core CPU, 2GB RAM
The Galaxy S7 is powered by Samsung's own Exynos 8890 processor in most territories, including here in the UK. Our US cousins get the more general, off-the-shelf (but still highly capable) Snapdragon 820.
Whichever chip you get, it will offer radically better performance than the Galaxy S6. Samsung claims that both will offer 30% better performance than the Galaxy S6's Exynos 7420 64-bit octa-core CPU. The phone's also got a memory upgrade, with Samsung having loaded the Galaxy S7 with a staggering 4GB of RAM.
Our own extensive hands-on time with the Galaxy S7 bears this performance boost out. Games in particular absolutely fly on this phone, whether it's the fast-paced 3D racing thrills of Asphalt or the detailed 2D puzzling of Lara Croft Go.
The iPhone, meanwhile, has the dual-core A9 chip and 2GB of RAM. That combo matched the S6, and even exceeded it in general usage, but Samsung holds the advantage - at least until the iPhone 7 arrives.
Our multicore CPU benchmark tests showed that the Galaxy S7 had a clear lead over the iPhone 6S for high-end tasks.

GALAXY S7 VS IPHONE 6S: CAMERA

Samsung Galaxy S7: 12-megapixel, phase detection, Dual Pixels, OIS, f/1.7 lens, 1/2.6" sensor, 1.4 µm pixel, 4K video, 5-megapixel front camera
iPhone 6S: 12-megapixel rear camera, f/2.2 aperture, dual LED flash, 4K video recording, 5-megapixel front camera
The iPhone 6S is no slow poke when it comes to snapping photos. The phone's automatic mode is one of the best we've seen on a smartphone and makes it quicker and easier to take great photos without having to get bogged down in complex settings.
It's only drawback is its lack of optical image stabilisation (OIS), a factor that, combined with its lower f/2.2 aperture meant it struggled to compete with the Galaxy S6 in low light.
The Galaxy S7 widens the gulf in that respect, employing a number of techniques to help boost its low light performance.
For starters Samsung's loaded the Galaxy S7 with a new 12-megapixel sensor - actually less than its predecessor - that's been designed to capture bigger pixels, and as a consequence more light.
The lens aperture has also been widened to f/1.7, meaning that much more light can physically enter the lens than with the iPhone 6S. Samsung claims the combination of factors mean the Galaxy S7 can capture 95 percent more light than its predecessor - which much equate to a whole heap more than the iPhone 6S.
Our own snaps seem to confirm this, with significantly better results in dark conditions for the Samsung phone.
But it's not just in low-light performance that the Galaxy S7 camera betters the iPhone 6S. It also has the best autofocus system we've ever seen in a smartphone. It's ridiculously quick and accurate.
The iPhone 6S camera remains one of the best in the business for general snaps in good lighting, in which the colour accuracy and general look is often preferable to the Galaxy S7 equivalent. But overall, the Galaxy S7 is the better photographic tool - especially when you factor in its handy home button shortcut and tweakable Pro mode.

GALAXY S7 VS IPHONE 6S: STORAGE

Samsung Galaxy S7: 32GB, microSD
iPhone 6S: 16GB / 64GB / 128GB
Samsung's only loaded the Galaxy S7 with 32GB of internal storage. By comparison the iPhone 6S is currently available with 16GB, 64GB or 128GB of internal space.
So, a win to the iPhone, right? Not quite.
While the additional options are nice, and we wish Samsung had followed suit and offered more, the entry-level Apple offering is pretty much hopeless. 16GB is completely inadequate for a modern flagship phone.
Also, unlike last year's Galaxy S6, the Galaxy S7 allows you to bolster its fixed storage with a microSD slot. Unfortunately, Samsung has shot itself in the foot somewhat by refusing to take up Google's Adoptable Storage facility.
This feature effectively turns any inserted microSD card as part of the core system storage. As it is, you can shift photos, files, and some apps to the microSD card on the Galaxy S7, but you're otherwise much more limited as to its usage.

GALAXY S7 VS IPHONE 6S: SOFTWARE

Samsung Galaxy S7: Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow, TouchWiz UI
iPhone 6S: iOS 9.3
Traditionally Samsung's insistence on loading Android smartphones with Touchwiz has been a key issue hampering their ability to compete with Apple iPhones.
As well as making Android's UI feel a little cluttered, the skin loaded past Galaxies with more bloatware than could easily be counted. What's more, the skin also radically delayed how quickly Samsung's phones could be upgraded to new versions of Android. This is because Samsung needs to tweak Touchwiz to work with Google's code with every new release.
To this day many Galaxy S6 smartphones have not been upgraded to Google's latest Android Marshmallow operating system.
Sadly (but predictably), Samsung doesn't seem to have learned its lesson with the Galaxy S7. It's better than before, but it still has TouchWiz and a stack of unnecessary extra apps. You still get two browsers and two music players, for example.
Some of Samsung's additions are quite nifty, such as the new Game Launcher that organises your games and lets you record footage of your exploits. But they're rarely essential additions to the core Android experience.
Say way you like about Apple's closed management of iOS, but it has let the company ensure device owners are always able to get software updates - so long as the iPhone, or iPad's hardware is able to run it. It also makes for a much cleaner, smoother, more consistent experience than Samsung can achieve with TouchWiz on the S7.
Samsung's managed to do great work fixing the bloatware issue on the Galaxy S7 and should be applauded for preloading it with Android Marshmallow. However, we're certain the upgrade issues will persist. From a pure software perspective, the iPhone 6S remains the better phone.

SAMSUNG GALAXY S7 VS IPHONE 6S: PRICING

Samsung Galaxy S7: £569
iPhone 6S: £539 - £699
At first glance, it looks like the iPhone 6S is cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy S7, which plays against expectations somewhat. Prices for Apple's phone start from £539, while Samsung's latest will start from £569.



Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 32GB Black 







Look a little closer, though, and you'll see that the entry-level iPhone 6S in question comes with a piddly 16GB of storage. Combined with a lack of expansion potential, it's a bit of a lame duck. Samsung starts off with a much more reasonable 32GB of storage, not to mention a microSD slot of expansion.
The next phone up in the iPhone 6S range comes with 64GB of storage, and that costs a hefty £619.



Apple iPhone 6s 16GB Rose Gold 





Of course, at least Apple provides you with such fixed storage options, as we've mentioned above. But you'll pay a hefty premium for the top model at £699.

VERDICT

The Galaxy S7 is an absolute beast of a smartphone that aces the smartphone holy trinity of design, performance, and camera. As such, it's a more than worthy rival to the iPhone 6S.
Samsung's phone features a much better display, a generally more capable processor, twice the memory, and a better camera. We'd still take iOS over Samsung's fussy TouchWiz UI any day of the week, but in most other respects we'd have to give the nod to the Galaxy S7.
However, this isn't really a surprise. Apple's iPhone 6S is already over halfway through its lifecycle as a flagship smartphone. Samsung's real competition awaits six months down the line.
                                                                                              Abdellah SLAOUI

samedi 21 mai 2016

samsungs-gear-s2-3g

Samsung's Gear S2 3G is a look at our untethered future


Every smartwatch you’ve likely seen, whether it’s an Apple Watch, an Android Wear device, or a Pebble, has relied on a smartphone for all of its smarts. If you were to disconnect any of these devices, they become little more than standard timepieces with a little bit of activity tracking. They become, in effect, dumbwatches with really poor battery life.
Smartwatches are therefore accessories to the main show, your smartphone. It’s hard to pitch them as must-have devices in your life when you still need your smartphone all the time to use them. Indeed, many of the complaints about smartwatches revolve around their duplicity: why do I need to wear this device on my wrist that just tells me the same thing the phone in my pocket is already telling me?
But while today’s smartwatches are shackled to a phone, that won’t always be the case. Eventually, smartwatches (and other wearables) will become independent devices, complete with their own wireless connections. There are some of these already available, and others are expected to hit shelves in the near future. I’ve gotten a small taste of this independent future over the past few weeks with the Samsung Gear S2 3G, a cellular-connected version of Samsung’s impressive Gear S2 smartwatch. The 3G model of the Gear S2, which is available for AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile (I’ve been using the AT&T version), is much like the standard model; it just happens to have a cellular radio inside that lets it do a few things other smartwatches can’t.
PHONE CALLS, MESSAGES, AND ACTIVITY TRACKING WITHOUT YOUR PHONE
For starters, the 3G S2 can place and receive phone calls without being connected to my phone. It has a speaker and microphone, so you can handle your phone calls Dick Tracy-style. It can send and receive text messages even if it’s not tethered over Bluetooth or connected to a Wi-Fi network. With the AT&T model, it can even make it look like those calls and messages are coming from my actual phone, thanks to AT&T’s NumberSync feature. (The Verizon and T-Mobile versions have call and message forwarding from your main number, but outgoing calls and messages will initiate from a different number.) It also has a GPS chip, so it can find my location without the help of a phone.
Samsung Gear S2 3G
Those features make it attractive for runners. You could leave your phone at home yet still track your run, get your calls or messages, and even listen to music. There are no armbands, belt pouches, or other clumsy apparatus necessary; just put the watch on your wrist, tie your shoes, and head out the door.
The Gear S2 3G does do all of that, but its capabilities are limited. While you can stay on top of text messages and phone calls from the device, it won’t see any of the other notifications pinging your phone when it’s not directly connected. (Samsung has a feature in its Gear Manager smartphone app that should enable this, but it did not work for me when the watch was connected to the 3G network.) The S2 doesn’t have a huge app store, leaving Samsung’s S Health app as the only real fitness tracking option, which doesn’t play nicely with other popular services such as Strava or MapMyFitness. You could transfer your music to the watch or stream songs from Samsung’s own Milk Music, but if you use Spotify, Apple Music, or Google Play Music, you’re out of luck. And, perhaps the biggest issue, the S2’s battery life is deplorably short when it is relying on a cellular connection. Go for a long run and try to play music, track your activity, and send or receive a few messages and it might not be alive when you’re done.
Samsung Gear S2 3G
It’s important to note that the 3G S2 is not a fully standalone device. You still need an Android phone to set it up and install any applications. It’s perhaps best to think of it as a standard Gear S2, with a few bonus features. It has the same overall design (it’s noticeably thicker when it’s off of a wrist, but I didn’t find it uncomfortable to wear in the least), complete with metal finish, vibrant display, and the intuitive and fun rotating bezel. And if you use it with your phone all of the time, its battery will last an entire day without issue.
THE S2 3G'S ADDED FEATURES AREN'T WORTH ITS COST
The Gear S2 3G is a tough sell. It’s more expensive than its non-connected sibling — $299.99 or $349.99, depending on carrier – and requires a service plan, which ranges from $5 per month at Verizon and T-Mobile up to $10 per month at AT&T in addition to your standard smartphone plan. The few advantages it offers over the less expensive pedestrian model aren’t worth its cost.
But it’s a glimpse at a future where I can do a lot of the communication handled by my phone on a smaller, wearable device. It starts with basic phone calls and text messages, but it doesn’t take a particularly creative imagination to add other forms of messaging, chat, location services, and activity tracking to the package. We’re still a few steps away from that future and there are a number of problems that need to be solved before we get there, namely battery life and functionality. (And it’s not clear if it’s something we even want: I had to force myself to walk away from my phone while testing the S2 and it was a struggle more than a convenience.)
Samsung Gear S2 3G
For now, you’re better off with the standard Gear S2 or any one of the many other smartwatches available instead of the Gear S2 3G. Smartwatches are just going to have to get a bit smarter before we can really leave our phones behind.
question
What do you think of the samsung gear s2 3g ? is what you will buy? answer me in the comments and subscribe
                                                Abdellah slaoui